Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Pheaney's avatar

I totally agree with Faithfulness as a metric. The problem is, faithfulness is a really hard thing to quantify or write home about. It also requires us to be brutally honest with ourselves and other believers/coworkers. We can fake our faithfulness if we have a new disciple (which is always a result of God's work, not ours).

At the same time, if we don't have any new disciples, I think we should question ourselves, look to the word, and seek Godly counsel on what we could do to change. The answer might be to keep persevering. Or maybe we have some changes to make, and God is withholding new disciples until we do. I think we hear Jeremiah wrestle with this in the Old Testament. Bro literally had zero fruit from his ministry, but he was 100% faithful to what God called him to do. (I know his goal wouldn't have been 'disciple-making' but I think the principle applies).

Thoughts? Let's continue the dialogue.

Trent Armstrong's avatar

I recently saw a post from a Disciple-Making FB group. The question was about how to measure success. Their answer had to do with how many disciples were made. I agree with your goal 100%, but I was unsettled by the metric posed by the other group. How would you answer their question? I can't get past the passages of the Parable of the Sower and of the Seed. Jesus himself said that a small percentage will actually become disciples, and the farmer isn't the one who convinces someone to become a disciple. The Father is in charge of that. All that to say: I am leaning toward "faithfulness" as the metric. Faithfulness will look different for each person, and it may only have an outward show some of the time. That would mean this metric isn't as public as it is precious to The Father. It will change the life of the faithful person and likely produce fruit in many areas, including disciples. Your thoughts would be welcome!

No posts

Ready for more?